Letter: It's past time to protect rights of R.I. women


To the editor:

As a young mother of two who grew up in a Catholic country where abortion is illegal, I feel compelled to write you regarding the recent coverage of the Reproductive Health Care Act (S 274 and H 5343).

In Brazil, where I was born and lived until the age of 18, abortion is illegal. Women who perform an abortion on themselves or allow someone to perform one for them can face one to three years in jail. The only exceptions being rape or a life-threatening condition for the mother. Whether you believe abortions are right or wrong, punishing women for them is absurd. Women who find themselves with an unwanted pregnancy deserve help and support, so they can make the best decisions for themselves and their families. Vulnerable women should not be threatened with the prospect of jail time or driven into shame or hiding for doing something “illegal.”

As I understand, Rhode Island has no protections in place should the federal government change their stance and leave reproductive rights in the hands of states. There are no protections for medically necessary abortions, or in the case of rape. Allowing abortions to become illegal only makes it harder to help women in need; it does not eliminate or reduce the number of abortions. They just stop being tallied. Wealthy women will always have access to abortion, whether here or abroad. Poor women will be the ones bearing the burden.

The Reproductive Health Care Act is aimed at codifying Roe v. Wade into Rhode Island law. It is critically important to clarify some of the misinformation that has been spread about the bill. S 274/H 5343 does not remove the requirement for parental consent. Partial birth abortions are prohibited under federal law and will not become legal. And the R.I. Department of Health will maintain its authority over the licensing and regulating of any health care providers and facilities. All Rhode Islanders who believe in respecting women and leaving difficult health decisions in the hands of women and their doctors, must let their representatives know.

It is past time to protect the rights of women in Rhode Island. Anti-choice and pro-choice activists who have as their true purpose to help women and families — and prevent abortions — need to come together and work on the things that are proven to actually reduce the demand for them. Things like health care, family leave, sex education and cheaper adoption processes. These are the things our government can take action on and truly protect the sanctity of all lives.

Daniela Abbott

52 Ladeira Ave.


letters, opinion


1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

I appreciate your handling of this controversial subject. I understand your interest in wanting to protect women in unfortunate, difficult situations. I also sure that we need to protect all women, even the pre-born. Something I've also come to understand is the irony of legal vs illegal. Changing the legal status doesn't change the nature of the action. Abortion has detrimental consequences regardless of government legitimizing it, just like fire will burn regardless of changing the descriptive adjective from hot to cold. Some consequences cannot be mitigated. Regardless of legal status, taking a life will have physical and emotional consequences for the mother and for the innocent baby, it's the harshest of penalties.

States have fought for the right to protect the vilest of lives. Pedophiles, rapists, murderers are spared from capital punishment in many courtrooms, yet, our most innocent and vulnerable are expendable, have no voice and are at our complete and utter mercy. Am I in favor of punishing women for "having no other options" or who are without any support system? No. But I believe there are always other options. They just are not taught or offered. What do we teach our children from a very young age about the street? Don't go in the street, don't go in the street. Why? Are we trying to deny them happiness or agency? No. We are trying to protect them from fatal consequences that we have no power to control. If we don't assign and teach correct consequences to behavior, nothing will improve.

I would love to see cheaper adoption prices. That would be wonderful. The past decades of sex ed in schools has not decreased the numbers of pregnancies and/or abortions, and healthcare can only address the physical side of this. What is missing in our society is a basic appreciation for the sanctity of human life, at all stages and ages, and the breakdown of families, the emotional side. If this were reversed, I believe the support systems would increase, the numbers of unwanteds/aborteds would decrease and there would be fewer cases of having to punish a woman and her doctor for killing an innocent 3rd party.

I am in favor of protecting ALL females (and males, for the record) and this includes consequences for behavior.

Monday, March 13 | Report this

2016 by East Bay Newspapers

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Prudence Island · Riverside · Rumford · Seekonk · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Mike Rego

Mike Rego has worked at East Bay Newspapers since 2001, helping the company launch The Westport Shorelines. He soon after became a Sports Editor, spending the next 10-plus years in that role before taking over as editor of The East Providence Post in February of 2012. To contact Mike to submit information, suggest story ideas or photo opportunities, etc., email mrego@eastbaynewspapers.com.