Aging Wisely

Can promissory notes be used in Medicaid planning?

By Macrina G. Hjerpe
Posted 10/20/16

Promissory notes can be a valuable tool in Medicaid planning, as illustrated by a recent federal district court case. Using promissory notes in Medicaid planning when a spouse needs long term care …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Register to post events


If you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here.

Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content.

Day pass subscribers

Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.


Aging Wisely

Can promissory notes be used in Medicaid planning?

Posted

Promissory notes can be a valuable tool in Medicaid planning, as illustrated by a recent federal district court case. Using promissory notes in Medicaid planning when a spouse needs long term care can allow the spouse at home to save all of the couple’s assets for his or her needs, which often are significant. A single person living in a nursing home can often save approximately half of their assets by properly using a Medicaid compliant promissory note.

In Rhode Island, to be eligible for Medicaid benefits, a nursing home resident may not have more than $4,000 in assets. If used properly, a promissory note can help a nursing home resident reach the appropriate level of assets.

On April 18, 2012, Oklahoma resident Juanita Lemmons transferred her farm and her Edwards Jones investment account to her son, Gary, in exchange for a promissory note in the amount $84,600, and then applied for Medicaid coverage. A promissory note is normally given in return for a loan and it is simply a promise to repay the amount stated in the note. Under federal Medicaid law, a loan is not supposed to be treated as a transfer of assets for Medicaid eligibility purposes if it satisfies these three standards: (1) the term of the loan must not last longer than the anticipated life of the lender, (2) payments must be made in equal amounts during the term of the loan with no deferral of payments and no balloon payments, (3) and the debt cannot be cancelled at the death of the lender.

The note in this case met the requirements of Medicaid law, but Oklahoma rejected Mrs. Lemmons' application for Medicaid benefits on a number of grounds, including its contention that (1) it was a sham transaction, (2) the note was worthless because it could not be resold, and (3) the transfer of the farm and investment account was subject to a transfer penalty.

Rather than appeal the case through the Oklahoma state system, Mrs. Lemmons (or her attorneys) went immediately to federal district court to assert her rights. In Lemmons v. Lake (U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. Okla., No. CIV–12–1075–C, March 21, 2013), the court first discusses whether it has jurisdiction over the matter, deciding that it does because Mrs. Lemmons is seeking to enforce an individual right to benefits under federal law.

Turning to the substance of the case, the court finds the action is not a sham because an enforceable promissory note exists. The court rejects Oklahoma's argument that the note is worthless, finding that a note is not worthless just because it can’t be sold on the open market. Finally, the transfer of property to Mrs. Lemmons' son in exchange for the note does not constitute a disqualifying transfer of assets because Mrs. Lemmons received the promissory note in return.

Shockingly, despite cases like the Lemmons’ case, some states regularly reject promissory notes, especially if they are between family members. Why? I believe, because they can — most elderly individuals living in a nursing home cannot afford to wage a battle in court against the state government. Fortunately, the Rhode Island Medicaid authorities understand the law and elder law attorneys here use promissory notes as an essential asset protection strategy. For other states, however, the Lemmons case raises the prospect of bringing these actions in federal, rather than state court, which could have a number of advantages, including: shortening the appeal process, being in front of courts less likely to be swayed by the effect of the decision on the state budget, and the possibility of the state paying legal fees in successful cases.

The use of Medicaid-compliant promissory notes is very complicated and requires special training. Before doing any type of Medicaid planning, it is essential that you consult an elder law attorney. 

Attorney Macrina G. Hjerpe is a partner in the Providence law firm Chace Ruttenberg & Freedman. She practices in the areas of Estate Planning, Probate, Estate Administration, Trust Administration, Trust Litigation, Guardianship, Business Succession Planning, Asset Protection Planning, Elder Law and Estate Litigation.

Macrina G. Hjerpe

2024 by East Bay Media Group

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
MIKE REGO

Mike Rego has worked at East Bay Newspapers since 2001, helping the company launch The Westport Shorelines. He soon after became a Sports Editor, spending the next 10-plus years in that role before taking over as editor of The East Providence Post in February of 2012. To contact Mike about The Post or to submit information, suggest story ideas or photo opportunities, etc. in East Providence, email mrego@eastbaymediagroup.com.