Editorial: Coast Guard cuts — Dumb idea


In a sea of preposterous proposals to surface lately, the notion of cutting the Coast Guard, in part to help pay for a border wall, is in a league of its own.

President Tump has proposed just that — a 12 percent cut in a Coast Guard budget that is already so tight that key parts of the mission are compromised. This while he pledges to boost spending on the military —  “It's gonna be so strong, nobody's gonna mess with us.”

Forget the fact that we were told over and over that Mexico would pay for this wall, as a security tradeoff this is a most shortsighted idea.

The wall will allegedly keep some ‘bad dudes’ out of the United States. The Coast Guard does that and so much more.
It is a first line of defense against drug smuggling, human trafficking, and growing coastal threats … studies warn that among the most obvious ways to import terrorists and weapons of mass destruction is within the shipping containers that enter US ports in vast numbers every day.

And if a border wall is actually built, what better way for smugglers of any sort to skirt it than an end run along either coast.

The Coast Guard’s mission of protecting mariners is stretched thin. Stations are closing and important navigational buoys off Sakonnet Point, Westport and many other places are to be removed … the Coast Guard simply cannot afford to maintain them.

The Coast Guard fleet is ancient — Of 35 ships, 25 are more than 50 years old, the oldest is 73.

Cuts would be especially painful here — Bristol is home to a buoy maintenance station, Newport is home base to ocean-going cutters, Warwick is home to the Northeast’s civil engineering division, and Woods Hole has one of the busiest Coast Guard stations.

And the South Coast and Narragansett Bay are among the country’s foremost boating and fishing destinations — those mariners routinely require Coast Guard help, often in the worst of weather.

Meanwhile, the President himself needs non-stop Coast Guard patrols every weekend off his Mar-a-Lago waterfront retreat — one more new drain on Coast Guard resources.

The Coast Guard provides very real protection from a wide and growing variety of threats. That wall will merely serve to steer intruders to other routes — diminished Coast Guard presence suggests that the water will be a favored choice.
Congress, for once, needs to take a unified stand for the sake of common sense.

US Coast Guard


1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Richard A. Ferreira

The cutting of the budget of the United States Coast Guard is ridiculous

if the goal of today is to enforce illegal immigration, thwart the huge import

of illegal drugs, protect our ports and harbors from terrorist activity, protect

our water and oceans from oil and other pollutants, or assist the navy and

other government agencies in national security.

In short, it is short sighted and stupidity squared.

What idiot thought this up?

Friday, March 24 | Report this

2016 by East Bay Newspapers

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Prudence Island · Riverside · Rumford · Seekonk · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Mike Rego

Mike Rego has worked at East Bay Newspapers since 2001, helping the company launch The Westport Shorelines. He soon after became a Sports Editor, spending the next 10-plus years in that role before taking over as editor of The East Providence Post in February of 2012. To contact Mike to submit information, suggest story ideas or photo opportunities, etc., email mrego@eastbaynewspapers.com.