While there are many sound reasons for our Bristol Planning Board to reject the Belvedere at Thames Street project, my overriding concern is that approval would set a precedent for all future development in our historic district — especially along the Thames Street corridor. Think about the large empty lots across from Robin Rug, the empty lot at the foot of Church Street next to Aidan’s parking lot and the two lots next to S.S. Dion.

There are clear guidelines for building along Thames Street that are not being met. The guidelines state that new developments should emulate the smaller structures on Thames Street, not the towering and imposing ones. No matter how attractive the architectural plans are, no design will overcome the mass of either version of the proposed structure no matter how many ways we look at it.

I would love that property to be developed — one that is in keeping with the Comprehensive plan and conforms to existing standards.

As a small business owner and historic district resident and property owner, I have had to follow all the rules. I don’t think someone should get a pass on such a significant project that will set the tone for future development in what is the heart of the Historic District.

Guidelines for new construction in the district are meant to assure that the qualities of our historic streetscapes will endure over time. They are also a signal that property owners can safely reinvest in sensitive improvements to their homes without the fear that a neighbor will undermine their investment with inappropriate new development.

We are caretakers of this very special place. What is ultimately built at that location will survive long after we are all gone. We only get one bite of the apple, folks. Let’s get it right.

Nancy Chace
21 Constitution St., Bristol