What happened on May 27, 2026, when Barrington voters went to the polls? From our perspective, a lot.
The first Financial Town Referendum in the town’s 309-year history was not just an …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
What happened on May 27, 2026, when Barrington voters went to the polls? From our perspective, a lot.
The first Financial Town Referendum in the town’s 309-year history was not just an historic first. It was an emphatic statement by the town’s taxpayers.
By approving 25 out of 36 budget amendments — all of them cutting into budgets and reducing the demand for property taxes — they said loud and clear: It’s our money, and we care enough to pay attention. But the real insights can be seen at a deeper level.
Here’s what voters did NOT do …
• They did not cast straight-line votes. If they had, outcomes would have been all Approve, or all Reject.
• They did not ignore this new and complex form of public financial oversight. In fact, it was quite the opposite. The number of referendum voters was four or five times greater than attendance at the average Financial Town Meeting of recent decades.
• They did not exert the will of a discernible political or party philosophy. In fact, outcomes seemed individualized, tailored to personal choices and beliefs.
• They did not attack or insult the majority of town employees who provide front-line services to the public. In fact, quite the opposite. They protected salary budgets for both firefighters and public works crews.
Here’s what voters did do …
• They exercised fiscal restraint. Given the opportunity to trim town spending, they took it. They made 25 small cuts to the town budget.
• They actually thought about their choices. Some cuts to nonprofits were approved. Some were not. Some cuts to departments were approved. Some were not.
• They clearly favored the front-line service providers, like police, fire and DPW, over less visible operations within the Town Hall. They heavily targeted administrative departments like Planning and Resiliency, Finance, the town’s legal services, and the Town Manager’s office.
• They protected the public schools — as they always have and always will.
Our final takeaway is this: The silent majority of Barrington voters showed up and found their voice. It was not heavy. It was not mean. It was not loud. But it was a stern exercise of will in the face of rising taxes, rising gas prices, inflation, and the cost of living.
We have always believed, and we continue to believe, that the vast majority of Barrington residents choose to live here because it is a safe, quiet town, with nice homes, scenic neighborhoods, and great schools. That is the DNA of this community. When given a chance to have more influence, they invested in schools, public safety, and quality of life. Same as they always have.