The Barrington Town Council is confronted with a decision concerning a noise ordinance that was put into effect back in 2003. The pivotal question at hand revolves around whether …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
To the editor:
The Barrington Town Council is confronted with a decision concerning a noise ordinance that was put into effect back in 2003. The pivotal question at hand revolves around whether they should consider modifying the noise ordinance and impose limitations on how residents utilize their private property or opt to maintain the status quo, which may encroach upon the privacy, tranquility, and wellbeing of residents. The policy proposal under consideration would indeed entail imposing restrictions on the use of two-stroke engines within the town's boundaries, presenting a challenging decision akin to a "devil's dilemma."
However, there exists a third option, one grounded in the values of privacy, individual autonomy, and respecting personal boundaries. Can the residents of Barrington unite in favor of transitioning to electric tools to prevent the intrusion of unwelcome noise and detrimental pollution on private properties?
The Barrington I have experienced exemplifies just that, good neighbors, respectful of personal boundaries, thoughtful and considerate. We organize meal-trains where friends and neighbors take turns providing meals to someone who is going through a challenging life event. We will even run a 5K to support a neighbor’s cause and pitch in. This describes many of the people I have gotten to know in Barrington.
Therefore, why should we expose our neighbors to the detrimental noise and particulate emissions generated by two-stroke engines? These outdated and inefficient engines, which circumvent pollution regulations, with limited sound insulation, and run at a speed three times faster than that of a typical automobile engine (9,000 rpm), leading to a loud and persistent noise reaching intolerable levels as high as 120 dB.
The air pollution stemming from two-stroke engines plays a role in health problems like hypertension, heart disease, and various types of cancers—conditions many of us have actively supported awareness for through events like 5K runs and may even have received a commemorative T-shirts.
Two-stroke engines release substantial quantities of particulate matter, known as PM2.5, comprising tiny airborne particles originating from incomplete combustion of petroleum and soot. These PM2.5 particles have adverse impacts on human health, as inhalation allows them to penetrate deep into the respiratory system, potentially leading to respiratory ailments, cardiovascular complications, and even premature mortality, particularly among vulnerable populations.
As responsible neighbors, we can benefit from the generous incentives provided by state and federal agencies to encourage the adoption of electric-powered tools. Opting for this transition to renewable electric energy, by choice, serves the collective good, rather than waiting for mandatory measures.
In my perception of Barrington, being a considerate neighbor is an integral aspect of our identity.
Magnus Thorsson PhD
Barrington
Thorsson is chairman of the Barrington Resilience & Energy Committee.