Letter: Concerns about installing artificial turf fields

Posted 1/24/23

To the editor:

In last week’s Barrington Times, the editor makes the argument that an artificial turf field is the solution to our athletic field problems. He claims that installing a turf …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Not a subscriber?


Start a Subscription

Sign up to start a subscription today! Click here to see your options.

Purchase a day pass

Purchase 24 hours of website access for $2. Click here to continue

Day pass subscribers

Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.


Letter: Concerns about installing artificial turf fields

Posted

To the editor:

In last week’s Barrington Times, the editor makes the argument that an artificial turf field is the solution to our athletic field problems. He claims that installing a turf field at Barrington High School would be environmentally friendlier and require less maintenance than the current grass field. He claims that installing a turf field would allow us to move sports off Chianese fields.

These claims are not supported by the work of the Ad Hoc Athletic Fields Advisory Committee as detailed in their October 2021 report. The report clearly states that replacing Victory Field with an artificial turf field would be “without any tangible benefit to the youth sports league athletes that suffer the brunt of the Town’s athletic field limitations.” The Committee’s recommendation is to focus further planning on the BHS fields directly adjacent to County Road. This location would require additional costs such as lighting and spectator and player amenities. In addition, its proximity to the Barrington River brings up many other concerns and would most likely be subject to CRMC review and approval. Artificial turf fields need to be specially designed if they are to be installed in a flood zone. I don’t believe that has been taken into consideration in the rough estimate of $3.8 million in the Committee report.

I have many concerns about the idea of installing artificial turf fields. Claims that newer turf manufacturing processes allow for the recycling of turf fields are speculative. We don’t know if that will be true 10 years from now, but we do know that at this time turf fields in RI, no matter how they are manufactured, are taken to the Johnston Landfill. There are now infill materials that claim to be more environmentally friendly and have fewer toxins, but each has its own challenges from freezing to allergy concerns. There are still many unanswered questions about health and safety risks, and more professional athletes and players unions are speaking out about their desire to play on natural grass fields.

I agree that Barrington should invest in more athletic fields and allocate more resources for field maintenance. There are way too many unanswered questions to conclude that turf fields should be a part of that plan, and with all that we know about Barrington’s vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise, it’s crazy to think about spending millions on an artificial turf field less than 250 feet from the Barrington River.

Kristen Kreuzkamp 

Barrington

2023 by East Bay Media Group

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Mike Rego

Mike Rego has worked at East Bay Newspapers since 2001, helping the company launch The Westport Shorelines. He soon after became a Sports Editor, spending the next 10-plus years in that role before taking over as editor of The East Providence Post in February of 2012. To contact Mike about The Post or to submit information, suggest story ideas or photo opportunities, etc. in East Providence, email mrego@eastbaymediagroup.com.