To the editor:I am quite concerned with the haste this city council is in to try to take the Metacomet property away from its current owners. I can appreciate the passion of those wanting to keep …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
To the editor:
I am quite concerned with the haste this city council is in to try to take the Metacomet property away from its current owners. I can appreciate the passion of those wanting to keep things as is but this situation calls for more discussion.
Eminent domain is a harsh way to accomplish a goal, that is why historically it is used for things that provide a full benefit to the public like highways. To use eminent domain to keep Metacomet a golf course is wrong. A golf course only benefits those who golf. If the city is serious about using eminent domain to take the property it should be for a use that all Townies can participate in. Keeping it a public course is irresponsible as we already have a public course a mile south.
Before the council spends a dime of taxpayer money I believe they should first let the comprehensive plan be completed. They can use that process to better gauge what ALL Townies believe should be done with Metacomet. I don't believe the narrative that the public has spoken and they want to buy a golf course.
I urge the city council to let the comprehensive plan process play out before moving forward with eminent domain.
Rick Lawson
Riverside
Mr. Lawson is a member of the East Providence Waterfront Commission and chairman of the East Providence Arts Council