Letter: Town’s draft decision for Bristol Yarn Mill is based on incorrect numbers

Posted 5/5/22

To the editor:

The developer’s — Brady Sullivan LLC — own submitted floor plans state multiple times that the Maximum Floor Area, the total Gross Floor Area (GFA) – or …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Register to post events


If you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here.

Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content.

Day pass subscribers

Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.


Letter: Town’s draft decision for Bristol Yarn Mill is based on incorrect numbers

Posted

To the editor:

The developer’s — Brady Sullivan LLC — own submitted floor plans state multiple times that the Maximum Floor Area, the total Gross Floor Area (GFA) – or buildable square footage – by their own calculation is 227,286 square feet. When this number is used as the basis for calculating the maximum number of units allowable by Bristol code, the total allowed is 101, not 127 units as proposed in the draft motion going before the Bristol Planning Board on May 12.

So why does the Town’s Draft Master Plan Decision for Bristol Yarn Mill state that the building “contains 296,717 square feet of gross floor area (not including the basement and the concrete building being demolished)”? What explains this 69,431 square foot discrepancy that enables the developer to build an additional 26 units? It is because the draft motion asking for 127 units is based on a totally incorrect number – a number that is useful for the Tax Assessor’s needs, but totally incorrect for the calculation of the Gross Floor Area number so critical to calculating the total number of allowable units.

The inflated 69,431 square feet are in areas on the first floor plans that are marked as “OPEN TO BELOW.” These are unbuildable portions of the first floor that represent the high ceilings of the basement parking area. The developer’s own floor plans for the first floor clearly show a total absence of any units for those areas that are “Open to Below” specifically because they are unbuildable and cannot be included within the definition of what can contribute to the total Gross Floor Area (GFA). This means that 101 units is the total number of units allowable for a total GFA of 227,286 sq. ft., following the Bristol code requiring 2,250 sq. ft per unit.

The only exception to this 101-unit maximum is a 20 percent allowable increase solely for affordable housing units that are built on the site. In Bristol, there continues to be a lack of affordable housing for citizens who have deep roots in the community and struggle to maintain their place here. Recognizing this, in 2021, the Town Council changed the Code to require the inclusion of 20 percent affordable housing units on new projects. Developers are given an incentive that allows a 20 percent increase of the density of the project with affordable housing inclusion. This incentive is the only path for developers to increase density. It would result in 20 additional affordable units built on site. This conforms to the Master Plan.

Bristol Town Code requires the Planning Board to comply with our zoning laws, not to rapidly change zoning to suit individual developers on demand. Article I Sec. 28-6, “Compliance with chapter”, requires the Planning Board to reject any change in density under section (b) Dimensional conformance. “…Nor shall the number of dwelling units or occupancy thereon be increased in any manner except in conformance with the dimensional requirements of this chapter.”

The applicant is asking that Bristol’s Zoning laws be changed. We are asking that the developer, like other property owners in Bristol, be required to follow the law and follow the Comprehensive Plan which were developed at substantial cost and effort by the entire community. The developer’s request for a change of zoning to WPUD is an end-run around Bristol’s code requirements.

Caroline Jacobus
35 Church Street

2024 by East Bay Media Group

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
MIKE REGO

Mike Rego has worked at East Bay Newspapers since 2001, helping the company launch The Westport Shorelines. He soon after became a Sports Editor, spending the next 10-plus years in that role before taking over as editor of The East Providence Post in February of 2012. To contact Mike about The Post or to submit information, suggest story ideas or photo opportunities, etc. in East Providence, email mrego@eastbaymediagroup.com.