Question: Do you think the town should use the majority of funds from the 2024 Recreation Bond to make significant improvements to the sports fields at Chianese Park?
Jessica Martin — …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
Question: Do you think the town should use the majority of funds from the 2024 Recreation Bond to make significant improvements to the sports fields at Chianese Park?
Jessica Martin — Democrat:
Yes—provided that the final design and cost estimates show Chianese will deliver the greatest long-term community benefit. Improvements could add field capacity, allow rotation and maintenance, improve parking, and address neighborhood concerns. This should not be a blank check, of course. The Council should require transparent public review, a realistic budget, and a maintenance plan, while respecting voters’ previous rejection of synthetic turf. We need to preserve funds for essential work at other fields, too.
Neile Hartman — Independent:
Spending the $3.4M remaining bond balance on only Chianese seems short-sighted given the total scope of our recreational needs. For one-quarter the cost, lighting BMS fields would provide significant additional capacity while utilizing existing fields and parking. Use of downward-focused LEDs and planting trees would minimize abutter impact. This approach preserves funds for one additional multi-use field needed to "rest" our grass fields. Let's prioritize investments that provide the greatest long-term town-wide benefit.
Braxton Cloutier — Democrat:
Chianese Park needs significant investment, and I believe it should be a major priority for the remaining recreation bond funds. However, voters approved these funds to improve athletic fields across Barrington, and we should honor that broader commitment. We have already invested in Haines Park, and Chianese presents an opportunity to make meaningful improvements while ensuring we retain resources to address other fields. Our goal should be better, safer, more usable fields throughout our community.
Anthony Arico — Independent:
No. The price tag is unclear and there are also other needs at our fields in town and the residents in that neighborhood have concerns that should be addressed and listened to. I’ve been a long-time member of the park and recreation commission and listen to their input as well as the leagues and other town residents. I think careful deliberations are very important before deciding issues.