Question 13 seeks to reduce the members of the Tiverton Planning Board from nine to seven. This is a bad idea.
The planning board needs members with a wide variety of professional backgrounds in …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
Question 13 seeks to reduce the members of the Tiverton Planning Board from nine to seven. This is a bad idea.
The planning board needs members with a wide variety of professional backgrounds in fields such as engineering, architecture, landscaping, and construction, among others, as well as members who live in different areas of town and who have different life experiences. This diversity is easier to achieve with more members rather than fewer. If only six seats are filled, as is currently the case, the quorum needed to conduct business is reduced to reflect the lower number of members, so four instead of the five required when all nine seats are filled.
Let’s encourage more people to get involved in shaping the future of our town rather than shutting would-be applicants out. Vote No on question 13.
Carol Herrmann
Gayle Lawrence
Susan Anderson
Ron Marsh
Tiverton